The Failure of Self-Actualization Concept – A Critique of Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow. Leonard Geller.Summary: This inquiry critically examines the self-actualization theories of Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow. Neither idea, it is argued, is right. Rogers’s concept is unacceptable insofar as his conception of the touchstone or standard of self-actualization is false, incoherent, and unworkable in observe. Beyond critiquing Rogers and Maslow, I try to determine the general presumption that self-actualization principle as such has very little to supply towards understanding and improving the human situation within late-twentieth-century Western society.
The foot (ch’o) is associated with the earth and feminine, yin power (Bolen, 1979). It could even be taken as a sign of movement or progress. The foot and road, considered as a unit, allude to stepwise movement alongside a path, or as Watts (1975, p. 39) places it, “going and pausing,” or “rhythmic movement.” This suggests a kind of motion where pauses are taken to assume or mirror before the following step is taken. According to Chung-yuan (1963), the foot may signify following.
Immerse your self in your on a regular basis experiences. Once we completely submerge ourselves in what we’re doing, we expertise “peak” experiences (experiences that will happen at the top of the pyramid). Maslow taught us that reaching these peak experiences causes us to really feel pure joy, a heightened sense of curiosity and awe, and 自己実現する a feeling of ecstasy.
And we will do this. But somewhere in between, we can get knocked off balance. We can really feel entitled. We are able to really feel overwhelmed. We are able to develop into traumatized. Or we can simply be engaging in passive aggressive energy. Whatever the game is, it’s someplace in that transactional analysis neck of the phrases of the tales we tell ourselves after which work together with one another.
They made contact by phone with the hostage-taker and continued negotiating with him for a number of hours. The negotiator constructed up a rapport with him by discussing the marital issues that had lead to his “disaster level.” Though he had nonetheless not fired the gun or aimed it at anyone, he had made threats to make use of it, so there was a real hazard to the hostage and police. In the end, because they’d constructed a relationship with the hostage-taker, they have been in a position to convince him to depart the gun contained in the home and are available to the front door to surrender. “It’s very important to get them to leave their weapons behind when they surrender,” stated Lt. Schmidt.